|
'The overriding objective of the competition
was to select a winning design and team who would be appointed to realise
the project with the promoters. As such the assessment procedure was not
set up to define "First, Second, Third and Commended" classifications.
However it should be said that although this entry did not win it delighted
the assessors at many levels and ran the eventual winner to a close call.
'In his presentation the architect started
by describing how difficult he found the site in terms of "edges
to which you could relate a building
" and then proceeded to
illustrate a building which showed a masterly ability to understand the
spacial geometry of the landscape and create an ingenious set of devices
to interpret and manage its insidiously watery characteristics. (The countryside
is relatively flat with clay subsoil and the highest number of field ponds
of any county in the country.)
'The scheme derives its underlying order
by the uncompromising division of the large triangular site into two smaller
ones through the formation of two parallel canals or moats running north
south at right angles to the slight fall. The building then stands within
the canals; picks up and develops this confident geometry and reinterprets
the canal theme at roof level with water bearing channels aligned ingeniously
to create dappled reflections deep within the house. The panel admired
the well-resolved, rather oriental feel to the architecture and the calm
hierarchy of spaces. But in the end the geometry also created seeds of
doubt about the messages that the architecture gives out about house and
home. Where the "footballer's chateau" entry stands at one extreme
as pompous replay of the "my wealth is my pride" variety of
great country house then this scheme is less pretentious but also less
clear in the iconic message it gives out; perhaps a little too much so
in the context of the larger Country House.'
Click
here to see the Grafton New Hall Project
|